Tax, sugar coated
Today (Friday), a tax on sugar has come into force in the
UK, alongside levies on other unhealthy products.
A series of studies by medical journal The Lancet on the
burden of "lifestyle diseases" - cancers, diabetes and heart disease
- caused by diet and activities rather than hereditary found that sugar and
unhealthy products contribute to around 38 million deaths worldwide.
The Lancet taskforce which carried out the studies
considered that lifestyle diseases are "a major cause and consequence of
poverty" affecting a higher number of "poor households".
Made more likely by alcohol, smoking and obesity, lifestyle
diseases can seriously impact ability to work, increase the risk of a shorter
lifespan, and, the studies claim, result in an economic impact. Taxing
unhealthy products, thereby encouraging healthier consumer choices, can
"produce major health gains... without disproportionately harming the
poorest in society".
Obesity rates have risen steadily over the past 10 years but
soft drinks manufacturers dispute The Lancet's claims, saying there is "no
evidence anywhere in the world" that the introduction of taxes will reduce
obesity rates.
Drinks (fizzy, squashes and juice) with more than 5g of
sugar per 100ml increase in price, around 14p per 500ml. Many drinks
manufacturers are reformulating product recipes to avoid paying the tax - Fanta
has already reduced sugar content by 30% - but some, such as Pepsi and
Coca-Cola originals will remain the same, and prices will increase as a result.
Whether you believe The Lancet or the soft drinks
manufacturers, the nub of the matter is, if you choose high-sugar content
drinks, you can expect to pay more from today. If your preference is based
on the potential impact to your health and wealth, then the government will
consider that the sugar tax has been a success.
The reality is, of course, that you will choose, pay and
consume according to your preference, as is your right. However, to combat the
rising health and economic impacts, we need to address other contributory
factors, such as inactivity, smoking and stress as well.
What's next I wonder? A sofa-tax?
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for ranting!